Principles: Shamelesness by @KheldarArainai

The Translator’s says: Principios: la importancia del Descaro was the first article I read written by Kheldar Airanai, who writes for his own blog at La Vida es Fluir. Not only that, at his short age he has seduced a lot of women, wrote the books “La Seducción al Natural: un punto de vista, una forma de vida” and “Vivir la Seducción al Natural”; and is currently teaching his lessons on his native Guadalajara and all over Spain, and even Latinoamerica. I admire him a lot for his insightful posts, his honesty far from the so called “Seduction Industry” and for his evolution all over this last four years that when I first met him, not in person, but ideologically.

_______________

Today I rescue from the cloths of the past a disappeared article of mine since it was offered as a guest post to a person who seems to value first his pocket than his friends…  what am cheeky, don’t I?

Yes sir, shamelessness. Something that they keep on condemning, to the point of anathematizing it. Something so forbid, precisely because it achieves wonders.

Day after day I, I see, I feel and I understand more and more the importance of shamelessness.

Just recent examples corroborate that with words like “you should know that in the same way as you have behaved with me, with a standard of confidence I feel really attracted to you”. Or even statements like “you’re somebody essential in this world”, just last night.

God bless shamelessness!  One of my friends and pupil on certain battles, used to believe until not so long ago –not long ago in the moment of writing this—that he had fucked it up with a girl, so he introduced her to me: “if I can’t have her, I don’t want other to have her except you”. Weirdest thing I’ve seen in my life, mind you.

So then happens that I, with my entire shamelesnees but not without subtleties –even when some doubt it I can have–; I could get the truth from her that she also thought that was her who had fucked it up with him [my friend] and she also blamed herself for noting him distant and cold with her. Come on, both of them believed that they had wronged the other, for nothing.

There’s a big difference between a real rejection and a misunderstood opportunity.

I save the conclusion of this situation for the already trespassed privacy of the involved, but I allow you to know that for some time the situation was a lot more favorable for him, thanks to the shamelessness I had. Then they fucked it up later, for real, by themselves.

Now bringing to the ‘seduction book’ for some of my most fervent followers. Here it goes:

Juggler and DeAngelo remark a lot the importance of shamelessness (or its American version) with their SOI’s or Statements of Interest and the famous Cocky and Funny, best known here as “ADIS” and “Chulifresco Divertido” thanks to the timely plagiarism of the SC project.

Personally, “Chulifresco Divertido” or any variant of the same (as it seems, right now there’s a so called “Chulifresco Encantado” version, and there can even be more) convince me less than zero than the idea of being a sweet little motherfucker or, in the literal sense of DeAngelo’s words: “Fun and Provocative”.

I’m not here to criticize anybody. Maybe those who, somewhat naively, have come to spoil the meaning and the importance of having a well calibrated shamelessness to get to know how far would you go with certain person and the limits she’d be capable of reaching.

It’s pretty clear that “If you don’t ask, you don’t get” (El que no llora no mama)…

So speak If you want some.

Shamelesness it’s  primordial to state what you  like and dislike of a person, of her body or her ideas, about her personality or the way she acts. A lot of times it achieves results and mutual benefits.

On the other side, it’s a HELL of a way of displaying certain values.

It’s important to be clear about what can happen in certain occasions and certain others, to be clear abot what you want to happen and what you want to get.

It’s important in order to enter and open, to escalate and close and, overall things, in order to fuck. Matter that lots who give more credit to the little head down there have to start to ponder, so the night doesn’t conclude with fap.

Not only it’s shamelessness important in conversational terms, but also in order to start physically approaching and even to pinch her with a touch, a gesture, a tap, a pinch, tickles …

To gain some confidence and comfort, physically speaking.

Movies and tv series provide us with a lot of examples of shameless characters who besides having some fictional traits that make it surreal and charming at the same time (for example, Charlie Harper in Two and a Half Men or Barney Stinson in How I met your Mother, any Stifller –except Erik—in the American Pie franchise)

To better observe an example of shamelessness in action, only look at the Spanish product and I’m not talking precicesly about the poetas de andamio. You’ve got other options, meet me or ask about me to anyone who has ever met or worked with me. Those who want to badmouth me, are those who will give you better impressions.

However, whatever they can tell you I think you’d prefer to have the experience of enjoying living and assimilating by yourself your own wxperience. What can happen there will always be a surprise to those who want to discover it.

As it can be seen in these last paragraphs, also it’s primordial the shamelessness in order to affirm oneself.

A lot of people don’t know the difference between being modes (which it’s based on accepting your reality as it is independently as it can be, besides speaking about it as you please), and giving you the opportunity of being a “hypocrite” (totally rejecting the labels you have, by pretending to be “modest”).

Shameless hugs to all (hey, hands off my as if you don’t want me to scrub the cebollar).

Kheldar

Gay Marriage is not a human right

 

the audacious amateur bloggersaid:June 20, 2013 at 10:29 pm

Thank you for your input. It is valued greatly. I completely agree “children deserve the love of a mum and a dad”.

What that has to do with marriage; I couldn’t say because the PSA did not say.

Does every child grow up with both parents? Was marriage “developed by man” for the sole purpose of child rearing?

I believe it was for economic and legal purposes if memory serves (according to the studies I read).

Not disputing the premise. A loving home with two parents. Just that the video nor you make the connection bt that and marriage.

Further. That may be all good and well but how does it relate to human right? The right of this child that may never exist? Or… Which human?

I think a discussion/deep dive into what a “human right” is may be necessary

Lastly, I understand this is a PSA made for and by Ireland. I wrote my post by a non-religious affiliated country. The US. There is no definition of what marriage “is” in our legal system and the clear division of church and state forbids any “religiously infused morality” to play into “to ban or not to ban”

Do you think the US has a right to ban gay marriage? If so, why?

Again thanks for bringing up good points. I can’t wait to have children to raise in a loving home between a man and a woman.

Oh wait, I’ve already been discarded as an alpha widow. Never mind. I guess one more potentially loving two parent hetero family bites the dust.

It’s only a video, well not.

“What that has to do with marriage; I couldn’t say because the PSA did not say. ”

That has to do with marriage because marriage it’s nort about love. It has love, yes, but love it’s not the basis, the basis it’s reproduction.

Marriage it’s where the reproduction of a society [it’s supposed to] happen[s]. I quote http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html : “Now, perhaps, you can see why marriage is an economic contract.

The male “sells” his surplus labour to the female in exchange for her reproductive ability.

The female “sells” her reproductive ability to the male in exchange for his surplus labour.”

“Does every child grow up with both parents?”

No, shit happens. Maybe one or both parents die, maybe one or both it’s coo koo crazy and without legal capacity to be a parent or maybe it’s a single mother. In the last eventuality, the exception it’s becoming the rule and we are seeing the prescense of kids growing without a father’s autorithy: girls slut it up and become like their single mothers and boys become thugs impregnate some single mothers and go to jail. The vicious cycle continues.

“Was marriage “developed by man” for the sole purpose of child rearing?”

I don’t know, but marriage and family helped with a lot of other things like: civilization. In the family there is the private property of the land by it’s inheritance that’s why Marx in the Communist Manifesto wanted to ban the family and the inheritance as a way to ban private property…thats why we have the feminism and the queer movements that with Political correctness want the family to be seen as a “patriarcal and oppresive institution.

“Do you think the US has a right to ban gay marriage? If so, why?”

A right? Gay unions are not the same as the marriage between a man and a woman and therefore don’t deserve the same protections and incentives, but that doesn’t matter anymore, even marriage between a man and a woman it’s fucked up, even here in Colombia (western world). Read: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/helen-smith/8-reasons-men-dont-want-t_b_3467778.html

If we allow same sex mariiage eventually we should allow poligamy, incest and gay incest. All for love.

 

the audacious amateur bloggersaid: June 21, 2013 at 7:50 am

Marriage doesn’t always have love. The term “marriage” actually… Outside “the law” is kind of open for interpretation,

What about couples that don’t have children? What was your explanation of that again?

Marriage I think, more and more (btw this is not a reflection of how I personally feel about it. I happen to believe it is a sacred institution and vows are vows meant to be kept, said with truth and integrity) was completely a “transaction”.

I’ll give you three goats and a chicken for your girl. Dowry. Arranged marriage. The monarchs using it like peace treaties – forget about procreation lets get some land or money out of this!

From that standpoint two men or women in a life union having the same economic benefits as different sex partners is a value to the US. Saves us a ton of Money.

Polygamy is an interesting subject. I actually don’t know how I truly feel About it. I mean it was a social norm for the majority of human history. I honestly don’t know…. I know it’s not “for me”.

Incest. K that one is directly tied to baby making and by that I mean genetically messed up baby making. That is literally to protect children from being born w horrible deformities.

Marriage is a word. I really hate it sometimes.. Language. Ironic since… I write

 

“What about couples that don’t have children? What was your explanation of that again?”

They can be married, but they’re the exception, not the rule.

Picture this: I have an exclusive club in Downtown. In my Club I only allow the admission of couples, a man and a woman. My club it’s named “Marriage”. I’m doing very well i my business, but then the competition opens a Club in front of mine and names it “Marriage” too but this club allows to enter same sex couples. Could I sue them for stealing my brand?

“Marriage I think, more and more (btw this is not a reflection of how I personally feel about it. I happen to believe it is a sacred institution and vows are vows meant to be kept, said with truth and integrity) was completely a “transaction”.”

I don’t care if it’s sacred or not. What I cared for it’s for the function that marriage and the family served in a non atomized society (read Advocatus Diaboli): it was the basis for the transmission of the property, the basis of the social division of labor, the basis for the education of the descendants, the basis for the solidarity with the elders and with the sick, but that was all replaced by the postmodern society, the “social security”, public “education” (indoctrination) and “Bureogamy”. There’s no way back, enjoy the decline and…

“Polygamy is an interesting subject. I actually don’t know how I truly feel About it. I mean it was a social norm for the majority of human history. I honestly don’t know…. I know it’s not “for me”.”

Fuck some studs(you)/sluts (me). Or you can become part of a Harem (if you’re hot, one of mines). Ex: Arabic countries filled with one sheik fucking 77 sluts everyday and a lot of omegas blowing up themselves for the promises of their space virgins. Love the Bonobos.

“Incest. K that one is directly tied to baby making and by that I mean genetically messed up baby making. That is literally to protect children from being born w horrible deformities.”

But don’t fuck your father you little Elektra.

What I say with this it’s an analogy: If you allow gay mrriage as an union between two capable grown ups who are of the same sex, eventualy you have to allow the union between two consenting and grown ups who happen to be relatives. Also they could be same sex relatives. Love it’s everything they say.

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Music Friday: David Guetta Ft. Afrojack «Louder Than Words»

Quote: Helen Smith: 8 Reasons Straight Men Don’t Want To Get Married

8. Single life is better than ever. While the value of marriage to men has declined, the quality of single life has improved. Single men were once looked on with suspicion, passed over for promotion for important jobs, which usually valued «stable family men,» and often subjected to social opprobrium. It was hard to have a love life that wasn’t aimed at marriage, and premarital sex was risky and frowned upon. Now, no one looks askance at the single lifestyle, dating is easy, and employers probably prefer employees with no conflicting family responsibilities. Plus, video games, cable TV, and the Internet provide entertainment that didn’t used to be available. Is this good for society? Probably not, as falling birth rates and increasing single-motherhood demonstrate. But people respond to incentives. If you want more men to marry, it needs to be a more attractive proposition.

via Helen Smith: 8 Reasons Straight Men Don’t Want To Get Married.

“Aislamiento” por @BillPowell71 a.k.a. C. M. Sturges

Nota de El Traductor: Bill Powell a.k.a. C.M. Sturges es el autor del blog Apocalypse Cometh: You are not going to like the future un blog en el que se exponen las implicaciones que más allá del game tiene la “Red Pill”. Si nos mintieron sobre las mujeres, ¿por qué hemos de creerles en todo lo demás? A continuación traduzco el post: Red Pill Isolation // Isolation

_______________

 (Nota de Mitch: Escribí esto a comienzos de enero y desde ese momento este sitio ha crecido exponencialmente. Me imagino que la mayoría de ustedes no se va a ir tan lejos en los Archives para leerlo. Yo ni lo consideraría, dado que he escrito cerca de 150 posts desde entonces. Además, este artículo es muy personal para mí, como alguien quien creció los sesentas y setentas, fue extremadamente difícil para mí llegar a estas conclusiones. Sin embargo, así es como se ve mi vida, con unas notables excepciones. Carajo, todavía es difícil y eso que he estado en esto por un rato. Para todos ustedes chicos nuevos y chicas nuevas que llegan a este sitio y a la Píldora Roja, esto es para lo que se tienen que preparar.)

“Los grandes espíritus siempre han encontrado una violenta oposición de parte de mentes mediocres. Estos últimos no pueden entender cuando un hombre no sucumbe impensadamente a prejuicios hereditarios sino que, honestamente y con coraje, usa su inteligencia” Albert Einstein

Hay un malentendido muy común en nuestra pequeña esquina de la webz: que exponerte a la verdad, esencialmente ir por el “agujero del conejo” va a hacer que tu vida sea mejor. Nada podría estar más lejos de la verdad. Admito que exponerte a la verdad te hará mejor con las mujeres, pero nunca confiarás en una de nuevo; probablemente te hará más exitoso en tu carrera, pero te hará querer no volver a trabajar de nuevo; y probablemente hará que navegar esta sociedad de mierda en la que vivimos un poco más fácil, pero hay un trueque que la mayoría no considera:

Te vas a aislar. Más notablemente, socialmente, pero también con tus propios pensamientos, opiniones y tu habilidad de finalmente ver lo que te rodea en esta sociedad decadente.

Tomar la “Píldora Roja” tiene consecuencias más allá de las que cualquiera pueda anticipar al comenzar su viaje en búsqueda de la verdad. Personalmente, fue algo que tuve que hacer la primera vez que me encontré en esta sección de la web. ¿Lamento algo de esto? No, en absoluto. Pero admito que ha hecho mi vida mucho más difícil de lo que sería si hubiera seguido en mi pequeña y feliz burbuja de trabajar para las corporaciones, formar lo que suponía sería una familia feliz, pagar mis impuestos como un buen esclavo y creer la bazofia que me estaban metiendo en la cabeza a diario. El asunto es, una vez que te tragas la Píldora Roja / Red Pill, no hay vuelta atrás.

Sin embargo, lo que sucede es que te conviertes en uno de los pocos hombres que saben cuán dentro del agujero del conejo van. Y como tal, todo a tu alrededor no es igual. Tus interacciones con tu familia y amigos, el modo en que consumes y casi todo lo demás que tiene que ver con cualquier interacción social.

Una vez que aprendes, todos alrededor rápidamente se vuelven insportables. Las personas con las que una vez pudiste haber tenido cierta conexión, después de poco llega todo hasta el punto en que no te puedes aguantar las pendejadas que salen de sus bocas. Tienes que alejarte de toda esa mierda continuamente o te vuelves loco. La soledad se vuelve algo a ser deseado en lugar de rechazado. Prefieres retirarte que interactuar. Cada vez que intentas ayudarlos a entender, eres mirado como un friki, alguien que se ha atrevido a salirse de la narrativa que baña a todos a cada minuto del día. ¿Alguien usa sombreros de papel aluminio? Todos a tu alrededor pensarán que usas uno.

Pronto descubres que todos los que te rodean son mediocres. Lo peor de todo, es descubrir que ellos se deleitan de su mediocridad. ¿Cuántos de los que conoces conocen lo que la palabra “misandria” significa? Nadie que yo conozca. ¿Cuántos de los que te rodeas saben que sin importar el que haya sido elegido en las últimas elecciones, nada va a cambiar? Nadie que yo conozca. ¿Cuántos de los que conoces de los que marchan a sus trabajos que les exprimen el espíritu a diario no son más que engranajes en la máquina que se hace cada vez más rica a costa suya? Casi todos los que conozco. ¿Cuántos de los que conoces gastan su vida parqueados en frente de la TV viendo fútbol, noticieros y realities? Casi todos los que conozco. (Con excepción de Moonshiners en Discovery, ese es un programa donde puedes aprender una valiosa habilidad para la vida).

Abre tu boca con la verdad una sola vez alrededor de estas gentes e instantáneamente serás condenado como persona non grata. Nadie en compañía educada quiere escucharlo. Inténtalo alguna vez y serás observado con extrañeza y a la espera de ataques. Es incluso peor si son parientes, la familia no tiene las barreras sociales que un grupo de conocidos puede tener.

Están programados. Nada de lo que puedas decir los va a alcanzar. Se han ido. Luego te atacan.

He logrado identificar que cualquiera que pueda leer este blog en esta pequeña esquina de la web es muy inteligente de entre la población que no ha sido reclutada todavía por las élites. Todavía no somos los individuos suficientes. Leí un estudio que afirma que una vez que una idea alcanza a la masa crítica consistente en el diez por ciento de la población, se hace viral en el noventa por ciento restantes. Personalmente no sé si eso sea todavía posible debido al gobierno, las escuelas y los medios. Espero que haya suficientes de nosotros ahí afuera quienes tengan el coraje de intentar de descubrir la verdad sin importar las consecuencias de ser aislados por el rebaño de borregos que las élites han criado por los últimos doscientos años o más. Tengo que darte esto, estar aislado por lo que pienso no es placentero, aún es algo que tengo que hacer.

El aislamiento es un pequeño precio a pagar por un mejor futuro.

Si acaso eso aún es posible.

Sabiduría de Hogan (Clint Eastwood)

Sara: You make very good coffee.

Hogan: A man on his own has to take care of himself.

Sara: So you’re not married?

Hogan: Nope.

Sara: Ever been?

Hogan: Nope.

Sara: Want to be?

Hogan: Nope.

Sara: Don’t you want a woman of your own?

Hogan: What for?

Sara: Share your name, bear your children, be a companion?

Hogan: To ask me to quit drinkin’, quit gamblin’, save my money and to bitch about her aches and pains? No, thanks.

via Dos mulas y una mujer (1970) – Quotes – IMDb.

Sara. Así que no estás casado.

Hogan: Nop

Sara: ¿Lo has estado?

Hogan: Nop

Sara: ¿Querrías estarlo?

(Hogan hace silencio y la mira)

Hogan: NOPE

Sara: ¿No quieres tener una mujer?

Hogan: ¿Para qué?

Sara: Para que comparta tu apellido, crie tus hijos, sea una compañía.

Hogan: ¿Para que me pida que deje de fumar? ¿Que deje de apostas y que empiece a ahorrar mi dinero? ¿Y para que se queje de sus dolores y males todo el día? ¡No, gracias!

Sara: Debe ser una vida muy solitaria.

Hogan: Es una gran vida. Las mujeres que quiero cuando las quiero y ninguna con el apellido Hogan.

LIKE A BOSS HOGAN